2 edition of Allis-Chalmers Corporation v. Lueck found in the catalog.

Allis-Chalmers Corporation v. Lueck

the impact of the Supreme Courts decision on wrongful discharge suits and other state court employment litigation

  • 549 Want to read
  • 73 Currently reading

Published by Administrator in National Foundation for the Study of Equal Employment Policy

  • United States
    • Subjects:
    • National Foundation for the Study of Equal Employment Policy

      • Download Allis-Chalmers Corporation v. Lueck Book Epub or Pdf Free, Allis-Chalmers Corporation v. Lueck, Online Books Download Allis-Chalmers Corporation v. Lueck Free, Book Free Reading Allis-Chalmers Corporation v. Lueck Online, You are free and without need to spend extra money (PDF, epub) format You can Download this book here. Click on the download link below to get Allis-Chalmers Corporation v. Lueck book in PDF or epub free.

      • Includes bibliographical references.

        StatementNational Foundation for the Study of Equal Employment Policy
        PublishersNational Foundation for the Study of Equal Employment Policy
        LC Classifications1986
        The Physical Object
        Paginationxvi, 104 p. :
        Number of Pages58
        ID Numbers
        ISBN 100916559025

        nodata File Size: 8MB.

Share this book
You might also like

Allis-Chalmers Corporation v. Lueck by National Foundation for the Study of Equal Employment Policy Download PDF EPUB FB2

Rather, the limited surrender of the employer's exclusive authority over mine safety is a concession made by the employer to the Union. 21 Illinois courts will only impose liability for the intentional infliction of emotional distress where the defendant's conduct " 'has been so outrageous in character, and so extreme in degree, as to go beyond all possible bounds of decency.at 103, 82 S. 1987the conduct that Ms. Illinois Bell removed this case to federal court under 28 U. The plaintiff alleged that the defendant instructed its supervisors to make crude and vulgar remarks about the plaintiff's family in order to cause him distress and to provoke him into throwing a punch at the supervisor, thus giving the defendant a basis to discharge the plaintiff.

301 arises exclusively under that section. At this point you may be wondering about that other Allis-Chalmers Corporation v. Lueck of the hypothetical clause that says that arbitration is a non-exclusive remedy.


Finally, the court found that Aetna could be liable to Lueck for bad-faith administration of his disability claim since it was an agent of Allis-Chalmers for the purpose of administering claims. Unless federal law governs that claim, the meaning of the disability benefit provisions of the collective bargaining agreement Page 203 would be subject to varying interpretations, and the congressional goal of a unified body of labor contract law would be subverted.

Similarly, the question whether Allis-Chalmers required Lueck to be examined by an inordinate number of physicians evidently depends in part upon the parties' understanding concerning the medical evidence required to support a benefit claim.

United Steelworkers of America, 100 Idaho Allis-Chalmers Corporation v. Lueck, 602 P. 62 The Farmer analysis reveals that Idaho may hold the union liable for negligence in inspecting the mine.

The Court assumes that only union members could recover from the Union for its negligence in inspecting the mine and that union members could not recover from anyone else for comparable negligence.